Sunday, September 30, 2012

The Wizard - 1989



The Wizard – 1989





It's more than a game... It's the chance of a lifetime.

     In the summer of 1989 me and my brothers spent our vacation at our grandmother’s.  She didn’t have cable, very many neighbors, and the only place for us to socialize was at church which my grandmother used as cheap babysitting.  Video rental stores were still big back then so without much else to do we played a lot of Nintendo and she’d often rent us movies.  I remember seeing 3 movies that summer, Ghostbusters 2, The Transformers Movie, and The Wizard, and I loved them all.  Watching this movie recently I can understand why I loved it as a kid.  In 1989 I cared about one thing and one thing only and that was Nintendo.  Hell we even had Nintendos in the daycare my parents used to unload us on.  I think adults across the country realized they’d get a break from their kids for a few hours if they just forked over a hundred bucks for a Nintendo and a few games to go with it.  As a kid I had no freakin clue what was going on in “The Wizard” but the Nintendo plot drew me in enough to entertain me and that’s all this movie was to me.  Put in the simplest kid’s terms “The Wizard” was a movie about Nintendo and kids roughly my age playing Nintendo.  Hell it even had adults playing Nintendo which is something I had yet to witness in real life.
               
      As an adult this movie makes no damn sense to me.  The plot has adult themes that most young children won’t even understand.  A lot of 80’s kid’s movies were like that.  I remember my family taking me to see “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?” and being completely confused.  “E.T.” had elements I didn’t understand(I never understood why the government was so mean and why E.T. was dying), as did “Ghostbusters”(adult relationships, science), and “Karate Kid”(there’s a scene where the bullies are smoking weed).  But this entire movie was based around themes I couldn’t even begin to grasp at the tender age of 8.  What’s more confusing is young Nintendo players from the ages of 7-12 were this movie’s target demographic.  The premise and dialogue were far too immature for anyone over the age of 13.  So why don’t we explore some of these adult themes shall we?
                 
     Well the movie opens with a small autistic boy walking alongside the road in the middle of the desert.  For whatever reason he wants to go to California(when they say “go” or “going” to California I can’t help but be reminded of that great Led Zep song).  At the time I saw this movie I had never been exposed to an autistic person and all I knew was there was something different about this character but I didn’t know what or why.  Even now I’m confused about the family dynamic in this movie.  Beau Bridges is the father of Jimmy the autistic boy but his ex-wife who is now remarried has custody.  Bridges is also the father of Nick(Christian Slater believe it or not) and Corey(Fred Savage), but then Corey says this strange line, “Just because he’s our half-brother it doesn’t matter right?”  Jimmy’s mother has a small role and it’s revealed a little later that Jimmy used to have a twin sister that died.  Okay I just have to step outside this for a second.  The family drama is so freakin annoying and hard to understand especially if you’re a child.  I can’t help but think if this movie didn’t have the Nintendo aspect as a child I would have had no interest at all in it.  In fact here is my childish interpretation of the movie, when I was a kid all I saw was 3 kids running away to achieve freedom from their overbearing parents and compete in a Nintendo championship.  Anyone over the age of 13 is evil because they are trying to prevent this from happening.  Any time an adult shares the screen with another adult they are arguing or fighting about something.  The messages are just so mixed but at that age I didn’t understand that parents had a legal and moral responsibility to protect and feed their children which doubles when they have special needs.

     Back on topic Corey finds out they’re going to put Jimmy in a home.  He’s mature enough to understand what this means but not mature enough to understand that it’s the best place for his autistic half-brother who keeps running away and putting himself in danger.  So what is his grand idea to save Jimmy?  In true child logic he kidnaps him from the home and runs away with him.  The two end up in a bus station only to find out that the twenty bucks Corey has isn’t enough to get them to LA.  While Corey is arguing with the clerk Jimmy plays an arcade.  When Corey rejoins him he finds out that Jimmy got an exceptional high score.  A girl overhears them and they make a bet, she cashes in her ticket and she loses.  I’d hate play the gender card here but in 1989 I didn’t know a single girl who played video games.  Hustling video games becomes a running theme in this movie and eventually how they get enough money to get to California.

     When the kids are discovered missing Bridges and Slater go to the police where Bridges’ ex-wife and new husband are waiting.  They introduce a character that specializes in finding lost children.  From here on out I’m going to refer to this guy as the Creepy Guy.  Since no one seems to be interested in his other son Bridges takes it upon himself to look for the children.  On his way out Creepy Guy tells him that he doesn’t get paid if someone else finds the kids and warns him to stay out of his way.  What the fuck?!  Did he just tell the father of two missing children that he couldn’t care less about his kids and his only concern is getting paid?!  Of all the unnatural dialogue in this movie this has to be the absolute worst, not to mention the most insensitive.  What’s worse is Creepy Guy continues to sabotage them for the rest of the movie.  The next scene this asshole is in he’s slashing Bridges’ tires and threatening him with a knife.  His behavior continues to be abnormal as he just sits idle in his car giving Bridges enough time to grab a shovel and bash his car.  When he does finally get the good sense to run away he stops and yells out “I don’t appreciate this!  You got no class!  No class at all!  Didn’t you just flatten the tires of a worried father searching for his two missing children?  This is just another line that is laugh out loud absurd.  Just about every line this character has fits in that category.  Creepy Guy is the very embodiment of unintentional humor.  The things he says and does make no logical sense and he’s only in this movie to serve as an obstacle for one set of characters and an antagonist for both sets of characters as well as pad the movie.
               
      Likewise other characters seem to act very inappropriately.  After hustling enough to make a fat wad of bills Haley starts counting it in the back of a truck they’re hitching in.  The truckers see it and chase them sometimes flinging these kids to the ground.  They succeed in taking their money and leave them in the middle of nowhere!  A different trucker who seems to be an acquaintance of Haley places craps bets for her.  No one seems to care that three kids are traveling by foot in rural areas miles away from civilization.  None of the people they hitch rides from are interested in doing the logical thing by taking three runaways to the nearest police station.  People witness Creepy Guy man handling and threatening small kids but don’t do anything.  There’s one scene where he’s yelling at Corey and a woman intervenes not to help Corey but to tell Creepy Guy where he can find Jimmy.  Afterwards he yells I HATE YOU right in his face and well within earshot of this woman.  Three teenagers get hustled and then nearly run over and beat up 3 smaller younger children.  Bridges flies into a rage and puts his and Slater’s life in danger by repeatedly crashing his truck into Creepy Guy’s car.
                 
     The movie ends with a lot of ambiguity.  I’m unsure what happens to Jimmy and Haley after they win the championship.  Earlier in the movie Corey makes a deal with Haley that if Jimmy wins they’ll split the $50,000 prize money.  When we find out that Haley's mother split and she lives in an isolated trailer with her absent trucker father she tells Corey she wants the money to buy a big house of her own.  Jimmy’s step dad is an asshole and he’s probably a lawyer too judging by the way he talks, so I doubt he’ll let Corey or Haley have any of the prize money.  Also the kids show up at the Nintendo championship without their parents and you’d think they’d at least need parental consent to be eligible to enter.  Since they didn’t I’m sure the money would go to one of the other three participants who did have consent.  Come to think of it I don’t know what the hell this Nintendo championship has to do with anything.  The reason they’re bringing Jimmy to California is because he wants to go and it’s not revealed until the end of the movie why he wants to go there.  At the end of the movie we find out the lunch box Jimmy carries with him everywhere has a few personal items of his dead sister.  When she was alive the family took a vacation to a Dino Park and he wants to inter her possessions there to lay her to rest.  None of this has anything to do with Nintendo or money.  After Jimmy places the lunch box in the Dino Park his mother tells Bridges that they’ll talk when they get home.  I have absolutely no idea what that means.  I think it’s either meant to imply that they’re getting back together or that she’s giving him custody of Jimmy.  The latter makes more sense because the movie closes on Bridges’ pickup with Jimmy, Haley, and Corey in the bed.  I kinda wonder if this means they’re adopting Haley too.  Regardless this movie could have done without a lot of the drama because kids don’t care or understand much of it.  It makes me wonder why this couldn’t just be a fun movie about kids playing in a Nintendo tournament.

     Aside from the Nintendo aspects,(the company has released numerous systems since this movie’s release, switched from cartridges to minidiscs to full sized discs, and the current Gameboy is light years ahead what the NES could do in 1989.  Funny how far gaming has come in just 23 years isn’t it?) The New Kids on the Block can be heard whenever the group is in diners(but only when they are in diners) making this movie horribly dated.  Just like "Mac and Me" the product placement here isn’t at all subtle.  It’s like they had a quota to fill with Nintendo and they had to have so many scenes featuring people playing it.  My favorite scenes are the ones where Bridges and Slater are playing Nintendo in their hotel rooms or at garages getting their pickup fixed.  Slater’s brothers are missing but it was a huge priority for him to fix his brother’s broken Nintendo so he didn’t get bored.  In one scene Slater wakes up only to find his dad has been playing Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles all night.  They could have been looking for the kids but screw that I just gotta beat this game.  “The Wizard” also has some of the worst one liners I’ve heard since the last time I saw “Cool as Ice” and Vanilla Ice mutters this classic “Words of wisdom, drop that zero and get with the hero”.  Here is just a sample of my favorite dialogue from this movie.

Yeah well uhh, just keep your power gloves off her, pal.”

Hey, it's the wizard! I hope you don't get nervous like last time. We wouldn't want you to...’wiz’ on someone!

To get away from the creepy guy in the casino Haley screams out “He touched my breast” forget the fact that I had no idea what a breast was at that age Creepy guy later says, “I touched her breast!  She doesn’t have any breasts!  I could only watch as my mouth fell open in shock and awe.  What a fucked up line.

Bateman, Bridges’ ex-wife’s new husband says this incredibly insensitive dialogue right after he says the only sensible thing any character in this movie says: 

Bateman: “You are missing the point.  I have an obligation to the welfare of this child.  I have to see that he is returned here for the kind of treatment he needs.”(he introduces a professional that finds lost children to find Jimmy).

Bridges: “What about Corey?

Batman: “Corey wants to run away doesn’t he?  Even if we brought him back would it do any good?
I couldn’t help from laughing out loud when I heard this.  How can you be good and then evil in the same breath?




As odd as it sounds this reminds a lot of another movie where a man absconds with his autistic brother in order to exploit him to gain money.  If you haven't got it yet I'm clearly talking about "Rain Man".  The only difference is that “Rain Man” is a way better movie.   
“The Wizard” is bad but it serves as a time capsule of late 80’s pop and gaming culture and this is what saves it.  Excuse me, the movie is stupid but not irredeemable just like the aforementioned “Cool as Ice” and “Mac and Me”.  They’re bad and cheesy but still enjoyable, mostly for how shameless and ill-conceived they are.  50/100

Monday, September 24, 2012

More Commercial Hate




        I’m starting to realize that so long as there are commercials on TV I will always hate them.  Thankfully I’m watching less and less TV because of it.  It also doesn’t help that I may very well be the last person on earth not to embrace the DTV conversion which just makes my television viewing experience even worse now that the image is stretched to fit the new widescreen format and somehow my reception is even worse than it was before the switch which is what we were promised when the switch was made.  At least with the analog format you could see through the static and didn’t lose your picture entirely.  For these reasons and many more I have pretty much stopped watching TV but it can’t help that stupid ad campaigns had a little to contribute to that.  So let’s take a look at the new series of commercials that are pissing me off.





There’s a lot of reasons I find this ad tiring.

1.    I don’t think I’ve ever seen a cell phone commercial I actually liked.  Those early Boost Mobile ads were the absolute worst and you couldn’t help but wonder if they weren’t pandering towards a certain demographic.

2.    It reminds me of those stupid ad wars Verizon had with AT&T with coverage maps and those commercials managed to make both ATT&T and Verizon like petty obsessive assholes.  Why the hell would you want to do that?  Why the hell would anyone want to do that?!  Proving your superiority by attacking your competition in ads is equivalent of the big guy on the playground pushing everyone around.  Every time you do it it doesn’t make you look bigger better or stronger it just makes you look like an asshole.  How bout this, instead of attacking your competitor by stating how much better you are you prove your product or service is good all on its own.


There's an ass for that


3.   It's a lot like those Geico ads I bitched about last time that offer information with nothing to back it up.  I love how cell phone commercials will provide you with “research” that you can either take at face value or look up yourself.  I guess that makes them the Fox News of the commercial world.  I don’t know who has the best coverage and quite frankly I don’t give a shit.  Ya know what kind of phone I have?  I have an old tracfone that only has basic access to the internet and I almost never lose calls.  Accuse me of being old fashioned if you will but I really don’t see the need to use a phone for every conceivable thing but a damn phone.  It’s more important to me that I get to talk to the people I need to talk to rather than download useless apps, access the internet(if I need to do that I’ll use a damn computer), or play games. 

4.    I get the joke.  The bar graph drastically shows how superior Verizon is to their competitors but you’ve got to take me for an idiot if you want me to think Verizon has that much of an edge.  If this “research” is true it would mean that T-Mobile has absolutely no coverage at all and Verizon has at least 4 times as much as their closest competitor.

5.    What the flying fuck is LTE?!  It took me the longest time to understand what the term 4G was when it started popping up in commercials.  I’m starting to think this is a tactic cell phone providers are employing to confuse the shit out of consumers.  Let’s introduce an industry term, abbreviate it so it appears more confusing, use the term casually making the consumer assume that he or she should already know what it means confusing them even more, and finally give them “research” about said confusing term until they’re so confused they believe 2+2=5 and gravity doesn’t exist.

6.   There is no way on earth I believe this was a real focus group.  Just imagine if political candidates employed this same tactic in their campaign ads.  They’d be exposed for the frauds they are and no one would vote for them.  But I guess it’s perfectly normal for a cell phone company to hire actors and provide fraudulent data.  I can’t place it but I swear I’ve seen that lady that says, “It doesn’t really matter how you present it.” in another commercial.

On top of all these flaws I just find it grating and annoying just like almost every commercial.  I didn't find it funny, cute, or informative(I'm assuming these were the aims of this commercial) the first time and every time after that it just gets worse and worse.


 Confession time; I hate Apple and most Apple products.  I even take issue with Apple users for their high and mighty dependence on the company.  I use a PC and I like it that way so it pains me that Microsoft is now the object of my ire.  I also use Google as a search engine.  I remember about ten or so years ago when I overheard a tech nerd talking to one of his buddies where he confessed that yahoo’s search sucked and he didn’t use.  Yahoo was the search engine I was using at the time and I couldn’t understand his disapproval of it.  After all even though he thought it sucked(for reasons he didn’t bother to go into to) I found it user friendly and always found the page I was looking for.  Now I hear about people going on about Bing and I use Google.  I’m perfectly happy using Google.  As far as I’m concerned all search engines are created equally and there’s nothing you can say to convinced me otherwise, plus I’m just stuck in my ways and unwilling to change.  






        Just like the Geico taste test commercial this is a supposedly blind internet search test.  What bothers me about this is they show the reactions of these people and them admitting Bing is better but we’re not allowed to see the results of their web searches making their opinions that “Bing is better” completely void.  If the intended result of the ad was to convince me to switch from Google to Bing I’m gonna need a little more information than random people saying it is.  At least the people they snagged for this commercial look more like normal people and less like actors.  This commercial is bad but I don’t find it nearly as irritating as most commercials.




        If you read my last article about annoying commercials it should come as no surprise to you that Geico made the cut again.   













When I first saw these commercials I wasn’t really paying attention and thought I had just seen two different commercials and this continued the next few times I saw them.  The problem here is I’m lulled into a daze by the first part of the commercial and when these idiots with the guitar and ukulele come on I have no idea what the commercial was originally about because they don’t seem to fit into whatever situation that came before it.  Seriously why the hell are they there and what the hell are they doing.  They just seem so out of place and this illusion is increased by the fact that these idiots are on a stage and playing instruments.  Essentially they are the commercial and everything that came before them is completely inconsequential.  Actually this is the same exact format as these commercials(only in reverse):




They only cut out the guy in the business suit and put in an annoying two man band.  They’re still using the same tactic of using a simile to explain that you could save %x on your car insurance.  The only difference is the previous versions of these commercials had one or two I didn’t hate and might have found funny but saw them one too many time they eventually lost their charm.  These on the other hand are annoying from the get go.  The punch line just falls so flat it’s embarrassing.  Are Geico commercials like watching a funny comedian do his routine?   No Jimmy, I’d say they’re more like watching a tragically unfunny comedian constantly bomb to the point where you just feel so bad you can’t bring yourself to boo at.  What makes these commercials even worse than the others isn't just because they're Geico commercials it's because they're a trifecta.  They aren't just one commercial they're 3 and I HAVE SEEN ALL 3.